Use cases

Who uses an independent overlay-risk witness

Anyone responsible for an accessibility-overlay compliance claim — and anyone who would have to defend it — uses OverlayRisk to get neutral before/after evidence about a page. It is evidence documentation, not legal advice.

Also used by

Ecommerce operators
Checkout, product, and account pages are the highest-risk flows for keyboard and focus failures. Overlays do not always fix those. An independent witness shows whether your highest-traffic pages hold up.
Marketing directors
Your team published the accessibility statement. Running a witness before publication or before a redesign goes live is the same discipline as fact-checking any other public claim.
Counsel-adjacent ops teams
You are the one assembling the file, not the attorney. A witness packet gives counsel timestamped, reproducible evidence they can evaluate without reconstructing a browser session from memory.

What every use case gets

  • A before/after axe-core test — the page loaded with the overlay on, then off.
  • A rule-by-rule diff showing what the overlay added, removed, or left untouched.
  • Timestamped DOM snapshots and screenshots of both states.
  • A downloadable Risk Packet that exists outside the overlay vendor's dashboard.

Run a free witness on your site

One page, no signup. See one real before/after finding for free. The full packet is $49; monitoring starts at $99/mo.